A former RAF officer will be the new chair of the British Transport Police Authority (BTPA).
Ron Barclay-Smith, who served in the RAF Regiment, was chosen following an independent selection process and has been appointed for a 4 year term from 5 March 2018.
He will chair the BTPA Board which holds the British Transport Police (BTP) to account to make sure the service upholds passenger safety and security on an increasingly busy transport network.
Mr Barclay-Smith is currently a non-executive director at the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority. He has also held various chief executive roles, including in the legal and health sectors, and has chaired a variety of organisations, including Veterans Scotland. He served in the RAF Regiment from 1972 to 1991, including 3 operational tours in Northern Ireland.
Rail Minister Jo Johnson said:
I should like to thank Mark Phillips for his contribution during his period as interim chair of the BTPA.
Ron Barclay-Smith has a wealth of experience and will provide vital and strong leadership for the BTPA over the next 4 years, as we invest in the biggest modernisation programme of the railways since Victorian times.
We have one of the safest railway networks in Europe and BTP officers play a vital role in keeping the travelling public safe, so it is vital we continue to give them the support they need to do that job.
Mr Barclay-Smith said:
I am delighted to have been appointed and I look forward to working closely with colleagues and staff at the authority, the Chief Constable and officers of the BTP, and the many stakeholders involved in the railway system in our country.
This is an exciting time for the railways as passenger numbers increase and a huge modernisation and development programme takes place. It is therefore a critical time for policing on the railways, and we need to ensure that investment is targeted in the right areas and front-line policing is sustained and supported effectively.
The BTP is a specialist, national force that provides a service to rail operators, their staff and passengers. It also polices other networks – the London Underground, Docklands Light Railway, Croydon Tramlink, Sunderland Metro and Glasgow Subway. It has around 3,000 police officers and around 600 PCSOs and special constables. The BTPA was established in 2004 to improve the public accountability of the BTP.
Minister for Transport and the Islands Humza Yousaf MSP
T: 0300 244 4000 E: firstname.lastname@example.org
Margaret Mitchell MSP Convener of the Justice Committee Scottish Parliament email@example.com
20 February 2018
BRITISH TRANSPORT POLICE INTEGRATION
Thank you for your letter of 8 February in which you requested an update on a range of matters relating to the integration of the BTP in Scotland into Police Scotland. I thought it would also be helpful to update the Committee on the overall status of the programme. The Joint Programme Board overseeing the integration of BTP in Scotland into Police Scotland met this morning. Significant progress has been made on a number of aspects of integration such as secondary legislation and pensions, and on mapping BTP terms and conditions to ensure they are transferred intact. Further details on these areas are provided below.
Under the auspices of the JPB, Police Scotland and BTPA have established a joint project to deliver the operational aspects of the programme. As part of that joint work, a workshop including members of the senior command teams from both Police Scotland and BTP met earlier this month to review progress on operational matters and found that a number of significant issues remained to be resolved. As a result of this assessment, the JPB was advised this morning that further time is needed to deliver integration most effectively and safely for railway passengers, staff and officers. Their assessment is that the current scheduled date of 1 April 2019 will not be achieved.
Ministers have accepted this advice and a detailed re-planning exercise will now take place over the coming months to ensure robust delivery plans are in place for all of the key elements of the programme and to establish a new delivery date. This approach reflects Ministers’ commitment to Parliament to keep the programme under review and to give any issues raised by the Joint Programme Board due consideration. This, in turn, reflects the importance I place on ensuring that a smooth transition is achieved which delivers continuity of service for rail users and staff. I would stress that I remain committed to ensuring the Act is fully implemented to ensure the benefits of a single command structure and improved access to the full range of capabilities of Police Scotland is delivered.
While a later-than-planned integration date is disappointing, I am clear that it also provides all partners on the JPB with an opportunity to enhance the process of engagement, in particular with officers, staff and their representatives on key issues, including those highlighted in your letter. The re-planning exercise will seek to ensure that additional opportunities for engagement are built into the timetable going forward. Ministers agree with the Committee’s view that reaching agreement on the terms, conditions, benefits and pensions of BTP staff and officers is critical to achieving a seamless transfer of railway policing to Police Scotland.
5 Atlantic Quay, 150 Broomielaw, Glasgow G2 8LU www.gov.scot
In relation to pensions, the Scottish Government is in discussions with the Trustee of the British Transport Police Force Superannuation Fund and of the British Transport Police Shared Cost Section of Railways Pension Scheme to ensure that BTP officers and staff who transfer into Police Scotland retain access to their current pensions. A proposal to achieve this has been put to the Trustees for discussion, and once we understand their position on key issues we will be well placed to consult representatives of pension scheme members, including those representing retired members such as the National Association for Retired BTP Officers on the proposed way ahead. This approach will ensure that there is meaningful engagement which reflects the views of the Trustee on how such arrangements can best be made to work.
The JPB has agreed and published a Q&A for officers and staff which covers a number of issues related to pensions and terms & conditions, and I attach this for reference. The publication of the Q&A has prompted further questions from officers and staff, and we are working through these with a view to updating the Q&A on a regular basis.
Members of the Joint Programme Board (JPB), including officials of the BTPA, SPA, Police Scotland and the Scottish Government met recently with representatives of the BTPF on 13, 14, 15 December and 9 January in full-day workshops to compare BTP/Police Scotland terms and conditions of service, including pensions. These full-day workshops will continue this week on 20, 21 and 22 February, with more workshops expected as this mapping work progresses. The purpose of this exercise is to ensure that the existing terms and conditions are understood at a level of detail which will allow work to progress on ensuring no detriment during the transfer process. Officials met with TSSA on 20 December, 1 February and again jointly with TSSA/BTPF on 12 February with another joint meeting to follow on 19 March. We are also planning to step up engagement with the SPF in the period ahead. An early part of the engagement plan will be to hold an event for BTP officers and staff in March.
Draft Scotland Act Orders for the transfer of BTP officers and staff in Scotland into Police Scotland are at an advanced stage of preparation by UK and Scottish Government officials and we expect to be in a position to commence engagement on these with key partners and other stakeholders in the coming weeks. This will include unions and staff associations.
With regard to the future membership of the SPF by railway policing officers in Police Scotland, I confirm there has been no change to the position as in my letter to you of 15 November, however, we remain open to further engagement with both BTPF and SPF on this point.
The next JPB meeting will be held at the Department for Transport in London on 6 March when the JPB will further consider the re-planning exercise. Both the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and I are committed to supporting JPB partners to maintain momentum towards the seamless transition that we’re working collectively to achieve. We will keep the Committee updated on how that work is progressing.
Scotland’s transport police could get separate scheme section
| February 14, 2018
Members of the British Transport Police Force Superannuation Fund are set to be moved to a new section in the scheme from April 2019 if trustees agree, while new recruits will join the unfunded police arrangement or Local Government Pension Scheme.
The proposed creation of a new scheme section is part of the planned merger of the British Transport Police in Scotland with the eight forces of Police Scotland.
In a Q&A, the Scottish government said that existing members will remain in the BTPFSF, which is linked to the Railways Pension Scheme.
The trustee will not agree to proposals unless it is satisfied that they are in the best interests of the beneficiaries
“It is proposed, subject to approval by [the Scottish Police Authority] board and the scheme trustee, existing BTP officers and staff can remain in their existing schemes but will transfer to a new section within the schemes, with SPA becoming the designated employer for these new sections.”
It added that “the benefits will be precisely mirrored in the new sections”.
Officers recruited after the merger with Police Scotland will become members of the Police Pension Scheme 2015, while new staff will be in the Local Government Pension Scheme.
Retired members raised concerns
The implications of the merger created waves when the National Association for Retired British Transport Police Officers heard of a proposal to move members of the scheme to a brand new pension fund.
NARBTPO requested a statutory guarantee that benefits would be protected while members were in what it considered to be a less secure arrangement, citing the fact that the BTPFSF was 101 per cent funded at its 2015 valuation.
It raised concerns over the viability of any new standalone arrangement, which would include just a few hundred members and start out as a mature scheme.
Honorary secretary Martyn Ripley said: “We’re not saying don’t go ahead with the new proposed fund. We are saying if you do it, we want it written into statute… or we want a Crown guarantee.”
However, the Scottish government has said that although a standalone scheme was one of the options, it was just one of many considerations, and was not the proposal ultimately put forward.
A spokesperson said: “The Scottish government has made clear that the jobs, terms and conditions and pensions of transferring officers and staff will be protected, while retired officers will continue to have access to their existing benefits from the scheme.”
RPMI, which administers the £1.2bn BTPFSF, confirmed the trustee has received a proposal from the Scottish government. It added that it will receive legal and actuarial advice before taking decisions.
“The trustee will not agree to proposals unless it is satisfied that they are in the best interests of the beneficiaries,” RPMI said.
Sectionalised industries ‘function more easily’
Those employed by British Rail before 1993 have a right to remain in the RPS, under the Railways Act 1993 and the protected persons regulations, John Hanratty, head of pensions for the north of England at law firm CMS, pointed out.
He said creating a new section is not uncommon within the rail industry and “will provide the member with continuity, so it should be the same as with the previous scheme”.
However, for the scheme and employer, “your costs become more volatile because you’re spreading them over a lower number of members”.
On the upside, any ‘last man standing’ issues would be contained to a section, unlike in non-sectionalised schemes, such as Plumbing Pensions, which can be left with orphan liabilities of an employer no longer able to pay.
For that reason, “these sectionalised industry-wide schemes seem to function somewhat more easily than the unsectionalised ones,” he said.
The link provided does not appear to work although it did on the original, either copy and paste into your browser or look on the Twitter page where it is already posted.
Forwarded to the website from Jim McElvie. Click on the link.
Received from Viv head:
This has just been received from Viv Head
UPDATE RE SCOTTISH PENSIONS.
NARBTPO have been in dialogue with the British Transport Police Authority and we are able to report as follows.
Negotiations are fluid and ongoing surrounding a number of issues. In relation to BTP pensions our requests to have protections enshrined in legislation are being considered. They have not been dismissed as unachievable at this time.
Please therefore note the following three items;
- Our request to have any changes to Scottish pensions protected in statute is being considered and has not been dismissed as unachievable.
- At the most recent meeting of the Joint Programme Board, pensions were discussed at length. It appears that the issues surrounding firm and binding protections has some support and will be discussed further.
- NARBTPTO will now be updated along with the other staff associations. NARBTPO will be invited to all future staff association meetings and briefings.
John Bryant Hon Chairman
Martyn Ripley Hon Secretary
Following info from Ken Graham, via Eddie Heron.
John Arthur Sangster:
Mrs Marion Sangster has phoned me with details of John’s funeral. The funeral will take place at Holmsford Bridge Crematorium, Dreghorn, Irvine, KA11 4EF, at 12.00 on Friday 23 February 2018. (She confirms the date as “three weeks come Friday” owing to heavy pressures on the crematorium.). There will be a formal announcement in the “Kilmarnock Standard” in due course and that can be viewed online.
Holmsford Bridge Crematorium is described as easily accessible from the main A71, A77 and A78 roads.
You might want to note, that John Sangster joined the Force in 1960, retired in 2000 and was aged 78 when he died. John and Marion have three sons – John, Alastair and Colin, and five grand-children.
John was not a member of NARBTPO.